|
Developed Sovereign Bonds
- Government-issued bonds from countries which have high levels of economic stability; widely considered to be free from default risk
- Lowest yielding segment of the bond market; returns can come from coupon yields or capital appreciation if interest rates decline further
- Susceptible to interest rate risk, inflation and currency fluctuations
- In the current low interest rate environment, we think the FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD-H1 is a viable choice
What are they?
“Developed country sovereign bonds” usually refer to government-issued bonds from countries which have high levels of economic stability. While the category has traditionally been used to describe bonds issued by G3 or G7 nations, it may also encompass government bonds of several developed Asian countries like Hong Kong and Singapore.
Within the bond universe, developed country sovereigns are conferred a special status – they are the only bonds which are perceived to be free from default risk. “Developed” countries are characterised by stable economic growth and prudent fiscal and monetary policy, which leads to stability in the domestic financial market. With low inflation, currencies of such countries are also kept stable, and thus their bonds and currency see huge investor demand. In addition, since the abandonment of Bretton Woods system, reserve currencies like the US dollar and British pound are fiat currencies (not backed by a physical commodity, like gold), which enables governments to create (in theory) unlimited sums of their own currency, substantially minimising the possibility of a default. In a time of crisis, developed country bonds are often beneficiaries of a “flight-to-safety”, as investors rush into safer assets.
Given that developed country sovereigns are widely considered to be free from default risk, their bond yields are commonly used as the risk-free rate for that particular country. In particular, the importance of the USD in a global context means that US Treasury bond yields are constantly scrutinised and used as the basis for the valuation of other riskier bond classes. Nevertheless, the recent Eurozone debt crisis has brought Greece (a developed country) to the brink of default (see “Greece – Light at the End of the Tunnel?” and “Perspective Required - Do You Speak Greek?”), which may leave many investors questioning whether developed sovereign debt is indeed free from default risk.
What’s my potential return?
Investors in developed country sovereign bonds generally look to coupon yields on bonds as a key source of return. Capital appreciation is also possible, should interest rates move favourably (downwards) resulting in higher bond prices, and investors who expect interest rates to decline will want to position themselves in longer duration bonds to benefit from declining interest rates. Corresponding to their near-impossibility of default (and hence lowered levels of risk), yields of developed country sovereign bonds are also the lowest within the bond universe. At present, the low interest rate environment has also sent government bond yields to extremely low levels (see Table 1) compared to their historical averages, minimising the potential for capital appreciation should yields fall even further.
| Table 1: Low yields on safer government debt |
US |
0.71% |
6.39% (since 1962) |
UK |
0.98% |
5.28% (since 1992) |
Japan |
0.34% |
2.10% (since 1988) |
Eurozone |
0.74% |
4.24% (since 1993) |
| Source: Bloomberg, data as of 31 January 2012 |
| Table 2: US Government Bond Yields |
10-year |
1.7971 |
7-year |
1.2383 |
5-year |
0.7045 |
3-year |
0.2925 |
1-year |
0.1119 |
6-month |
0.0763 |
3-month |
0.0508 |
| Source: Bloomberg, data as of 31 January 2012 |
According to the Ryan Labs US Treasury total return index, US government bonds have returned a compounded annualised 8.4% (in USD terms) from end-1979 to end-January 2012. However, looking at historical returns for an indication of future potential returns on developed country bonds is perhaps not the best method. As of 31 January 2012, the US 10-year government bond’s yield was a paltry 1.797% (see Table 2) while the 10-year yield has averaged 7.02% (since 1979).
The strong historical returns of US Treasuries may thus be explained by the differences in the interest rate environment. As shown in Chart 1, US benchmark interest rates have been slashed from their highs in the late 1970s to almost zero at present (as of end January 2012), and longer-duration US government bond yields have also followed this trend. Consequently, investors who bought the 10-year US government bond in 1980 enjoyed a yield of more than 10%; today, that yield has been slashed to less than 2%.
[Investors may wish to refer to our Weekly Bond Market Updates for a chart indicating the latest yields available in various bond segments]
Chart 1: Falling benchmark interest rates drove down yields

What are the key risks?
While developed country sovereign bonds are largely free from default risk, they are still highly susceptible to interest rate hikes, especially for longer duration bonds. The rate-cutting cycle from 2007-2009 in the US benefitted US Treasuries as falling yields meant rising bond prices. With developed economy benchmark interest rates at or near all-time lows, interest rates are more likely to rise going forward, which could negatively impact these safer government bonds.
Inflationary expectations are also a key factor to consider. Other than inflation-linked bonds, the bond principal and coupons will be eroded by inflation, and investors will demand higher nominal yields to compensate for this. High inflation is thus a negative for developed country bond holders, while a deflationary outlook is a positive.
A third critical aspect, currency, should also be considered. While developed country currencies are generally expected to be stable, the recent investment landscape has been peppered with bouts of currency volatility, even for major currencies like the USD and the EUR. Given the already-low yields on developed sovereign bonds, a minor depreciation in the currency could easily wipe out bond returns.
What funds to buy?
Developed sovereign bonds form some of the largest and most liquid bond markets, which endears them to many fund managers; many bond funds will own some developed sovereign bonds (US Treasuries in particular) usually for liquidity purposes. Investors looking for exposure to the segment may wish to consider the following funds:
Government-centric Global Bond Funds:
FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD-H1
FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD
FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) USD
Fullerton Global Bond Fd Cl B SGD
Legg Mason WA Global Bond Trst
Nikko AM Shenton Dynamic Bond Fund
United Global Bond SGD
The United Global Bond SGD, Fullerton Global Bond Fd Cl B SGD, Nikko AM Shenton Dynamic Bond Fund and Legg Mason WA Global Bond Trst are all managed from an SGD-perspective, which means that while the funds may be invested in bonds denominated in various developed country currencies (eg. USD, EUR), the managers will consider fluctuations of these currencies against the SGD in their investment decisions. Investors should note that while the funds’ benchmarks are government bond indices, the funds may be expected to hold non-government bonds as well.
Templeton Global Bond Fund is a viable choice in the low interest rate environment
While we have a less favourable view on the developed sovereign bond segment, we believe the FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD-H1 (a recommended global bond fund) is poised to do well despite the difficult interest rate environment. The fund is managed from a USD perspective, but is hedged to the SGD to reduce currency volatility for Singapore-based investors. The other two classes of the same fund, the FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD and FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) USD offer exposure to the strategy in USD, and will be suitable for investors seeking returns from a USD perspective. An interesting feature of the FTIF-Templeton Glb Bond A(mdis) SGD-H1 is its high conviction approach, highlighted by the manager’s willingness to stray significantly from the benchmark in terms of both country selection as well as portfolio duration.
As of 31 December 2011, the fund carried an average duration of just 1.6 years, representing substantially lower interest rate risk compared to its benchmark’s duration of over 7 years. In addition, the fund’s largest holdings were in South Korean and Polish government bonds, as opposed to US Treasuries or German bunds, allowing the fund to carry a weighted average yield-to-maturity of 5.3%, against the benchmark’s 1.7%. While the fund’s long-term high conviction approach (especially in its active currency management) has seen the fund demonstrate considerable volatility over recent months (see “Why Have These Two Bond Funds Exhibited Such High Volatility?”), we remain convinced that investors who align their investment horizon with that of the manager will stand to benefit when market conditions normalise in due course.
Developed sovereign debt yields unattractive? Stay tuned for better opportunities in fixed income
Given the historically-low yields on developed sovereign bonds, investors may wish to seek better opportunities elsewhere within the fixed income space. Investing in such bond segments will entail higher risk, but offer much stronger potential returns compared to developed sovereign debt. Stay tuned for subsequent articles in the series where we discuss riskier segments of the bond market like High Yield bonds and Emerging Market debt.
See also:
Income Investing Series: The Basics
Why Have These Two Bond Funds Exhibited Such High Volatility?
Bonds Weekly – Asian High Yield Leads [2 Feb 2012]
|