| Diversify, Diversify, Diversify! |
November 20, 2003 |
| Our research desk explains why. |
| Author : Wong Sui Jau |
|
Untitled Document
WHY DIVERSIFY?
You hear it so often. Most financial advisors encourage investors to diversify
their investment portfolios. Why the need to diversify in the first place? And
does diversification really work?
Diversification involves splitting your money up so that it can be invested
in several different areas. It means not putting all your eggs in one basket.
While diversification lowers risk, it can lead to money going into investments
that either lose money or deliver low returns.
Thus some investors question the need to diversify in the first place. They
point out that if all their money was placed into one great investment, then
they would achieve the maximum amount of returns. But that's with the benefit
of hindsight. In reality, it is much harder to accurately predict which investments
will deliver huge profits in the future.
Given this uncertainty, some investors prefer to put all their money into
fixed deposits. Others might bet the entire farm on just one investment. Both
methods are not very good. The latter is akin to betting, while the former
means passing up on good investment opportunities. The benefit of diversification
is that it gives you a wider exposure to various investments while lowering
risk.
WE SET OUT A SIMPLE HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE BELOW
We have 5 possible investments, labeled A,B,C,D,E. At this point in time,
each of these investments look as if they might deliver good returns. But
we do not know for sure. For investors who choose to avoid all 5 investments
and put the money into fixed deposits, they would be passing up several potentially
good investment opportunities. For investors who decide to put all their money
into just one of these investments, mathematically their chances of making
it big is around 1 in 5, or just 20% (20% is not exactly very good odds, and
since gambling usually involves even worse odds, I still fail to understand
why people want to gamble).
However, let's diversify. We split our money into 5 equal portions and invested
them into the 5 investments A,B,C,D,E. Our investments looked like this:
|
Investment A
|
Investment B
|
Investment C
|
Investment D
|
Investment E
|
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
Now, let's assume these investments were left untouched for 20 years.
After 20 years, the 5 investments had the following annualised returns:
|
Investment A
|
Investment B
|
Investment C
|
Investment D
|
Investment E
|
|
+15% per year
|
+5% per year
|
0% per year
|
-5% per year
|
-15% per year
|
At this point in time (after the 20 year holding period) how much money do
you think you'd have?
Looking at the above return, how many of you are thinking that the exercise
was a total waste of time because after 20 years, you're back where you started
with the original $25,000?
It may surprise you that the actual amount of your total investments after
20 years based on the above, is $102,085
That's 4 times higher than what you started out with, and your portfolio
has now effectively delivered an annualised return of 7.29% each year on average.
How did that happen? How could the above portfolio deliver such a good return
when there should have been no gain at all? Let's look at Table 1 for an explanation.
TABLE 1
|
Year
|
Fund A
|
Fund B
|
Fund C
|
Fund D
|
Fund E
|
Total
|
|
Starting amt
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$5,000
|
$25,000
|
|
2004
|
$5,750
|
$5,250
|
$5,000
|
$4,750
|
$4,250
|
$25,000
|
|
2005
|
$6,613
|
$5,513
|
$5,000
|
$4,513
|
$3,613
|
$25,250
|
|
2006
|
$7,604
|
$5,788
|
$5,000
|
$4,287
|
$3,071
|
$25,750
|
|
2007
|
$8,745
|
$6,078
|
$5,000
|
$4,073
|
$2,610
|
$26,505
|
|
2008
|
$10,057
|
$6,381
|
$5,000
|
$3,869
|
$2,219
|
$27,526
|
|
2009
|
$11,565
|
$6,700
|
$5,000
|
$3,675
|
$1,886
|
$28,827
|
|
2010
|
$13,300
|
$7,036
|
$5,000
|
$3,492
|
$1,603
|
$30,430
|
|
2011
|
$15,295
|
$7,387
|
$5,000
|
$3,317
|
$1,362
|
$32,362
|
|
2012
|
$17,589
|
$7,757
|
$5,000
|
$3,151
|
$1,158
|
$34,655
|
|
2013
|
$20,228
|
$8,144
|
$5,000
|
$2,994
|
$984
|
$37,350
|
|
2014
|
$23,262
|
$8,522
|
$5,000
|
$2,844
|
$837
|
$40,494
|
|
2015
|
$26,751
|
$8,979
|
$5,000
|
$2,702
|
$711
|
$44,144
|
|
2016
|
$30,764
|
$9,428
|
$5,000
|
$2,567
|
$605
|
$48,363
|
|
2017
|
$35,379
|
$9,900
|
$5,000
|
$2,438
|
$514
|
$53,230
|
|
2018
|
$40,685
|
$10,395
|
$5,000
|
$2,316
|
$437
|
$58,833
|
|
2019
|
$46,788
|
$10,914
|
$5,000
|
$2,201
|
$371
|
$65,274
|
|
2020
|
$53,806
|
$11,460
|
$5,000
|
$2,091
|
$316
|
$72,673
|
|
2021
|
$61,877
|
$12,033
|
$5,000
|
$1,986
|
$268
|
$81,165
|
|
2022
|
$71,159
|
$12,635
|
$5,000
|
$1,887
|
$228
|
$90,908
|
|
2023
|
$81,833
|
$13,266
|
$5,000
|
$1,792
|
$194
|
$102,085
|
|
Annualised returns
|
+15%
|
+5%
|
0%
|
-5%
|
-15%
|
+7.3%
|
We see that in the first year, the portfolio did deliver exactly zero returns.
However, as the years continued to go by, the worst performing investment
became a smaller part of the total portfolio, while the best performing investment
became a bigger part of the portfolio. Eventually the compounded returns of
the winning investment A, (and to a lesser extent B) helped the portfolio
to deliver good overall returns.
This highlights both the power of compounding as well as the power of diversification.
On seeing the individual returns, some might think that the investments chosen
for the above example were terrible. Two out of the 5 investments lost money
consistently! And investment C is like putting money into your savings account.
After 20 years, you might as well have not bothered. (A $5,000 "investment"
into a savings accounts giving 0.5% per year results in just $5,524 after
20 years).
Even investment B was not that great. It returned 5% per year, nothing to
be particularly excited about. Only investment A was the true winner, delivering
a compounded 15% per year. However, the power of diversification has allowed
the investor to get an annualised portfolio return of 7.3%. Thus when you
diversify, you do not require all your investments to make it big, you just
need some of them to succeed.
This is what fund managers attempt to do with their stock selection, and
this is also why we advise investors to diversify. In the above example, diversification
allowed us to be almost completely certain that we would get a good return
for our portfolio, even if two of the selected investments went nowhere, and
one was the equivalent of putting your money under the mattress!
In the real world, it is also unlikely that an investor will end up with
an investment that consistently loses money every single year for 20 years.
He would most likely have switched out from this investment long before the
20 years was up. It is also not easy to get an investment that delivers an
annualised 15% over 20 years.
Nevertheless, the above example was meant to highlight to investors the concept
of diversification and to show in raw numbers why it works. Through this example,
we hope that investors realize why diversification is very important. It allows
you to invest with greater confidence as all your investments need not be
huge winners for you to obtain a good overall return for your portfolio.
Wong Sui Jau (AFP, Research Manager and a licensed
investment representative) is part of the Research and Editorial team at
Fundsupermart, a division of iFAST Financial Pte Ltd.
No investment decision should be taken without first viewing a fund's
prospectus. Any advice herein is made on a general basis and does not
take into account the specific investment objectives of the specific person
or group of persons. Past performance and any forecast is not necessarily
indicative of the future or likely performance of the fund. The value
of units and the income from them may fall as well as rise. Opinions expressed
herein are subject to change without notice. Please read our disclaimers
|
|
|
|
|