
We strive to analyze funds with as long a comparable history as possible and only within their peer group. For a look at our methodology, please go to here. Please note that while we hope that these recommendations would be useful for investors, they are also advised to look at the fund's prospectus and do their own further research before making their investment decisions.
We advise investors to have a diversified portfolio that is spread over the whole world. The recommended funds should not be seen as being recommended in isolation. These funds are what we would recommend amongst their peer groups if you would like to invest in a fund from a particular sector or region. So, if you are interested in funds from one region like Japan, then you can see the recommended funds we have within the Japan region. There is little basis of comparing a Japan fund with a Europe fund.
For investors who are also interested in an allocation to the various sectors, we suggest that you go to our Assisted Buying module and try it out. A diversified portfolio will be suggested to you based on your risk profile, time horizon, and amount invested. For aggressive investors who wish to take more risk for the purpose of potentially higher returns, you can take note of the articles we sometimes put out highlighting Fundsupermart's view of a particular region. We also have a star rating system assessable from the main page which shows our view towards each region here.
For a more detailed description of why we recommend any particular fund, please click on the recommended fund's name below:
Funds Payment Mode.
O - CPF Ordinary Account,
C - Cash Only,
S - CPF Special Account.
| Funds Recommended | Performance(Annualised) | |||
| 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 5 years | |
| Asia Bonds | ||||
| Legg Mason Asian Bond Trust (Risk Rating:4) (C) | 11.5% | 6.88% | 2.24% | 3.01% |
| Asia-Ex Japan | ||||
| Fidelity Asian Sp Sit USD (Risk Rating:8) (C) | 10.78% | -0.93% | -5.25% | 8.54% |
| Schroder Asian Growth Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | 17.74% | 1.32% | -5.8% | 6.84% |
| CPF special account funds | ||||
| DWS Premier Select Tst (Risk Rating:6) (C,O,S) | 4.82% | -3.92% | -6.43% | 1.42% |
| First State Bridge (Risk Rating:6) (C,O,S) | 12.58% | 1.47% | -1.01% | 4.61% |
| Emerging Europe | ||||
| Schroder Emerging Europe Fund (Risk Rating:9) (C) | 18.85% | -20.34% | -14.69% | - |
| Emerging Market Equities | ||||
| Aberdeen Global Emerging Markets (Risk Rating:9) (C,O) | 19.57% | 4.25% | 0.18% | - |
| Schroder ISF Gl Em Mkt Opp A Acc SGD (Risk Rating:9) (C) | 12.12% | 0.12% | -2.25% | - |
| Emerging market bonds | ||||
| United Glb Emerging Mkts Portfolios S$ (Risk Rating:5) (C) | 10.17% | 13.12% | 5.22% | 5.09% |
| Europe Equity | ||||
| Henderson Hzn Pan Euro Eq A2 EUR (Risk Rating:8) (C) | -3.36% | -5% | -13.03% | -0.79% |
| PRU Pan European Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | -13.15% | -21.78% | -20.5% | -5.12% |
| Global Bonds | ||||
| DWS Lion Bond Cl A (Risk Rating:1) (C,O,S) | 5.54% | 3.35% | 2.55% | 2.47% |
| PIMCO Glb Bond Cl E USD (Risk Rating:2) (C) | 6.69% | 6.16% | 1.49% | - |
| Global Equity | ||||
| Aberdeen Global Opportunities (Risk Rating:7) (C,O) | 2.62% | -10.72% | -12.17% | -0.74% |
| Henderson Hzn Glb Opp Fd A2 USD (Risk Rating:7) (C) | 3.11% | -11.96% | - | - |
| Global Techonology,Media and Telecommunications | ||||
| Henderson Global Technology (Risk Rating:10) (C) | 8.57% | -0.97% | -7.56% | -0.07% |
| Greater China Equity | ||||
| First State Reg China (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | 10.96% | 0.76% | -2.15% | 11.45% |
| High Yield | ||||
| PRU Mthly Income Plan Cl A (Risk Rating:4) (C) | 11.67% | 3.48% | 0.76% | 3.4% |
| India | ||||
| HGIF Indian Eq SGD AD (Risk Rating:9) (C,O) | 26.53% | 2.75% | -2.41% | 12.85% |
| Japan | ||||
| DBS Japan Growth (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | -7.69% | -12.58% | -16.85% | -5.59% |
| LionGlobal Japan Growth Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | -2.76% | -11.09% | -15.87% | -5.15% |
| Korea | ||||
| Fidelity Korea USD (Risk Rating:9) (C) | 25.34% | -6.6% | -13.65% | 4.83% |
| Latin America | ||||
| ING Inv Latin America USD (Risk Rating:9) (C) | 24.47% | -9.91% | -5.15% | 14.49% |
| Malaysia | ||||
| Aberdeen Malaysian Equity (Risk Rating:9) (C,O) | 24.75% | 10.73% | 3.33% | 9.97% |
| Singapore Equity | ||||
| Aberdeen Singapore Equity (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | 24.43% | 1.4% | -2.12% | 8.93% |
| Singapore bonds | ||||
| Legg Mason Spore Bond Class A SGD (Risk Rating:1) (C,O,S) | 4.22% | 5.7% | 3.45% | 2.85% |
| Taiwan | ||||
| Fidelity Taiwan USD (Risk Rating:9) (C) | -1.89% | -10.78% | -12.51% | -3.06% |
| Thailand | ||||
| Aberdeen Thailand Equity (Risk Rating:9) (C,O) | 30.09% | 7.35% | -0.03% | 8.54% |
| US Equity | ||||
| FLF Opportunities USA USD (Risk Rating:8) (C) | 1.16% | - | - | - |
| Fidelity America USD (Risk Rating:8) (C,O) | 3.45% | -8.17% | -13.6% | -6.15% |
| The figures in the above table were last updated on July 7, 2010. | ||||
The performance figures in the table above are calculated using offer-to-bid prices, with any income or dividends reinvested. Performance figures of over 1 year are annualised. (Eg. A 33.1% gain in 3 years works out to a 10% gain per year when annualised.) As per MAS regulations, the offer price is based on the normal sales charge which is higher than Fundsupermart's discounted sales charge.
Funds Payment Mode.
O - CPF Ordinary Account, C - Cash Only, S - CPF Special Account.
| Asia Bonds |
|
Legg Mason Asian Bond Trust (Risk Rating:4) (C)
The Legg Mason Asian Bond Trust was the best performing fund over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised 3.9% return. On a calendar-year basis, the fund has done better than its peers by delivering four positive calendar-year returns over the past five years. However, the fund scored badly in terms of resiliency. In the period after Lehman’s Brother Inc’s collapse (12 September 2008 to 30 October 2008), the fund dived 23.5%, a fall more than double most of its peers’. The past performance of the fund suggests an aggressive style of fund management, which is likely to benefit investors more during periods of economic up cycles. |
| Asia-Ex Japan |
|
Fidelity Asian Sp Sit USD (Risk Rating:8) (C)
The Fidelity Funds - Asian Special Situations Fund (USD) was the second-best performing Asia ex-Japan equity fund on the platform over the five-year period ended March 2010. The fund’s 12.2% annualised return compares favourably with the 8.4% average of its peers. Over calendar-year periods, the fund displayed consistency in performance, ranking third (out of sixteen funds in the category) in 2006, 2007 and 2008. The fund also displayed resilience in the 2008 market downturn, declining 45.2% from 6 May 2008 to 24 November 2008, better than the 50.8% average decline of its peers. |
|
Schroder Asian Growth Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The Schroder Asian Growth Fund was the fourth-best performing fund in its category over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The fund’s 10.3% annualised return over the period compares favourably with the 8.5% return of its peers (those with a five-year history). On a calendar-year basis, the fund exhibited consistent performance by doing better than the peer median in all but one year (from 2005 to 2009). It was ranked fourth for 2009, with a 79% return substantially higher than its peers’ average of 64.7%. |
| CPF special account funds |
|
DWS Premier Select Tst (Risk Rating:6) (C,O,S)
The DWS Premier Select Trust was the best performing fund in its category over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised 3.8% return, better than the 1.5% average return for peers on the platform. It was also the strongest performer (out of seven CPFIS-SA approved funds) over cumulative one-year and five-year periods, and the second-best performer over two-year and four year periods. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was the best performer in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009, indicating consistency in performance. |
|
First State Bridge (Risk Rating:6) (C,O,S)
The First State Bridge Fund was the best performing fund in its category over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised 6.6% return, better than the 5.4% average for peers on the platform (those with a four-year history). It was also the strongest performer over cumulative two-year, three-year, four-year and five year periods (out of five CPFIS-SA approved funds). On a calendar-year basis, the fund was the best performer in 2008 and the second-best performer in 2006. |
| Emerging Europe |
|
Schroder Emerging Europe Fund (Risk Rating:9) (C)
The Schroder Emerging Europe Fund was the best performing Emerging Europe Equity fund on the platform for cumulative returns over four-year, three-year and two-year periods ended March 2010. Over four years (end March 2006 to end March 2010), the fund’s -1.8% annualised return was better than the -3.2% average return for funds in the category. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first (out of three funds in the category) in 2009, and was ranked second in both 2007 and 2008, indicating consistency in performance. |
| Emerging Market Equities |
|
Aberdeen Global Emerging Markets (Risk Rating:9) (C,O)
The Aberdeen Global Emerging Markets Fund was the best performing fund in its category over four years (end March 2006 to end March 2010) with an annualised 9.3% return, better than the 3.2% average for its peers (those with a four-year history) on the platform. It was also the strongest performer over cumulative one-year, two-year and three-year periods. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was the second-best performer in 2009, and was ranked third (out of ten funds) in 2006 and 2008, indicating consistency in performance. The fund also exhibited resilience in the recent market downturn, its 47.3% decline from 21 May 2008 to 9 March 2009 comparing favourably to the 52.9% average decline of its peers. |
|
Schroder ISF Gl Em Mkt Opp A Acc SGD (Risk Rating:9) (C)
The Schroder International Selection Fund - GEM Opportunities was the second-best performing fund in its category over three years (end March 2007 to end March 2010) with an annualised 5.2% return, compared to the 0.7% average for its peers on the platform. The fund was the second-best performer in 2008, falling 42.8% while its peers declined by 52.7% on average. Despite its relative resilience in the downturn, the fund’s 70.2% return in 2009 was also stronger than the 67.7% average for other global emerging market funds. |
| Emerging market bonds |
|
United Glb Emerging Mkts Portfolios S$ (Risk Rating:5) (C)
The United Global Emerging Market Portfolios was the best performing fund over three years (end March 2007 to end March 2010) with an annualised 6.6% return. On a calendar-year basis, the fund’s performance led other funds in the category in 2008 (during the downturn for emerging market bonds) but lagged during the upturn in 2009. The fund stood out for its resiliency during periods of distress for global emerging markets bonds. Form 15 September 2008 to 24 October 2008 following the collapse of Lehman Brothers Inc, the fund fell only 3.1% while peers on the platform fell 23.9% on average. |
| Europe Equity |
|
Henderson Hzn Pan Euro Eq A2 EUR (Risk Rating:8) (C)
The Henderson Horizon Fund - Pan European Equity Fund (EUR) was the best performing Europe equity fund on the platform over a cumulative five-year period ending March 2010. The fund’s annualised return of 3% was substantially stronger than the -1.6% average return of its peers over the same period. The strong cumulative performance was achieved as the fund displayed resilience in the market downturn from 1 June 2007 to 9 March 2009, declining only 48.4% while funds in the category declined 60.4% on average. On a calendar-year basis, the fund ranked first (out of seventeen funds) in 2008, and fourth in both 2005 and 2007. |
|
PRU Pan European Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The PRU Pan European Fund was the second-best performing Europe equity fund on the platform over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The fund’s 0.3% annualised return compares favourably with the -1.6% average return for funds in the category over the same period. On a calendar-year basis, the fund displayed consistency in performance, and was ranked second (out of seventeen funds) in 2006, fifth in both 2008 and 2009, and seventh in 2005. In the market downturn from 1 June 2007 to 9 March 2009, the fund declined 57.2%, but this was less than the 60.4% average decline for funds in the category. |
| Global Bonds |
|
DWS Lion Bond Cl A (Risk Rating:1) (C,O,S)
The DWS Lion Bond Fund was the second-best performing fund over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised 2.9% return. On a calendar-year basis, it was the only fund in its category that delivered positive calendar-year returns for all the past five years. During times of downturn for global investment grade bonds, the fund has exhibited resiliency by falling much lesser than most peers. From 17 March 2008 to 13 June 2008 when global bonds on the platform fell 5% on average, the fund dipped only 2.2%. |
|
PIMCO Glb Bond Cl E USD (Risk Rating:2) (C)
The PIMCO Global Bond Fund USD delivered returns slightly above the peer average over the past three years (end March 2007 to end March 2010) with an annualised 2.2% gain. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked third in 2009, but fared poorly in 2008 and 2007. While its historical performance numbers are not outstanding, the fund’s resiliency stood out during periods of downturn for global investment grade bonds. From 17 March 2008 to 13 June 2008, global bonds on the platform fell 5% on average while the fund dipped only 2.0%. |
| Global Equity |
|
Aberdeen Global Opportunities (Risk Rating:7) (C,O)
The Aberdeen Global Opportunities Fund was the second-best performing global equity fund on the platform over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The fund’s 3% annualised return was significantly better than the -0.5% average return for funds in the category, and was just one of three funds (out of twelve funds with a five-year history) to achieve a positive return over the period. On a three-year cumulative basis, the fund was the best performing global equity fund with a -4.4% annualised return, ahead of the -9.5% average return for global equity funds on the platform. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first in 2005, second in 2008, and fourth in 2007, indicating consistency in performance. |
|
Henderson Hzn Glb Opp Fd A2 USD (Risk Rating:7) (C)
The Henderson Horizon Fund - Global Opportunities Fund (USD) was the third best-performing global equity fund on the platform over the five-year period ending March 2010. The fund’s 0.4% annualised return over the five-year period compares favourably with the -0.5% average return for funds in the category, and was just one of three funds (out of twelve funds with a five-year history) to achieve a positive return. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked second, ninth and sixth (out of nineteen funds in the category) in 2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively, indicating a consistent record of outperformance. In the market downturn from 20 May 2008 to 9 March 2009, the fund displayed its resilience by declining 47%, less than the 50.5% average decline for global equity funds. |
| Global Techonology,Media and Telecommunications |
|
Henderson Global Technology (Risk Rating:10) (C)
The Henderson Global Technology Fund was the best-performing fund in its category over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised 3.8% return, better than the 2.2% average for its peers on the platform. It was also the strongest performer over cumulative two-year, three-year, four-year and five-year periods. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was the top performer in 2007 and second-best performer in 2008 (out of five funds), indicating consistency in performance. |
| Greater China Equity |
|
First State Reg China (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The First State Regional China Fund was the best performing Greater China equity fund on the platform over cumulative five-year, four-year and one-year periods ending March 2010. Over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010), the fund’s annualised return of 14.6% was significantly better than the 11.9% average return for funds in the category, while the fund’s 12.2% annualised return over four years (end March 2006 to end March 2010) also compares favourably with the 7.9% average for Greater China equity funds. The fund also displayed resilience in the market downturn from 31 October 2007 to 31 October 2008, falling the least among its peers (out of seven funds in the category). |
| High Yield |
|
PRU Mthly Income Plan Cl A (Risk Rating:4) (C)
The Prudential Monthly Income Plan was the best performing fund over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010) with an annualised return of 5.0%. On a calendar-year basis, it was ranked either first or second among its peers from 2006 to 2008 following its launch in 2005. However, during the upturn in 2009, the fund’s performance lagged behind its peers. In terms of resiliency, the fund does not stand out as it performed in line with peers during periods of distress in global high yield bonds markets. |
| India |
|
HGIF Indian Eq SGD AD (Risk Rating:9) (C,O)
The HSBC GIF Indian Equity Fund was third-best performing Indian equity fund on the platform over a cumulative five-year period ending March 2010. Despite being ranked third (out of five funds in the category), the fund’s 16.9% annualised return was still higher than the 15.9% average return for Indian equity funds. Calendar-year returns are far more impressive. The fund was ranked first in 2006, 2007 and 2009, and its 126.3% return in 2009 was significantly better than the 79.3% average return of its peers. However, the fund’s resilience appears to be a detractor. The fund fell 70.3% in 2008, substantially worse than the 58.2% average peer decline. |
| Japan |
|
DBS Japan Growth (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The DBS Japan Growth Fund was the second-best performing Japan equity fund on the platform over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The Japanese equity market had a relatively poor spell of performance over this period, but the fund’s -2.5% annualised return was better than the -4.6% average return of its peers. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first in 2007, second in 2008, third in 2006 and fourth in 2005 (out of eight funds in the category), indicating consistency in performance. |
|
LionGlobal Japan Growth Fund (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The LionGlobal Japan Growth Fund was the best performing Japan equity fund on the platform over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The fund’s -1.9% annualised return over the period was a poor result, but this compares favourably to the -4.6% return of its peers over the same period. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first in both 2005 and 2009, with its 24.4% gain in 2009 far outperforming the 7.1% peer average return. |
| Korea |
|
Fidelity Korea USD (Risk Rating:9) (C)
The Fidelity Funds - Korea Fund (USD) was best performing South Korean equity fund on the platform over cumulative one-year, three-year, four-year and five-year periods ended March 2010. Over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010), the fund’s 7.2% annualised return was much stronger than the 2.8% average return of its peers. While the fund has demonstrated strong cumulative returns, the fund displayed lower resilience in market downturns. The fund declined 70.6% from 31 October 2007 to 28 November 2008, the worst performer among the four South Korean equity funds over the period. |
| Latin America |
|
ING Inv Latin America USD (Risk Rating:9) (C)
The ING Invest - Latin America (USD) was the best performing fund in its category over a cumulative five-year period ending March 2010, with an annualised return of 21.1%, compared to the average return of 19.5% for funds in the category. Over four years (from end March 2006 to end March 2010), the fund was the second-best performer, its 10.6% annualised return over the period outperforming the 9.1% average return for Latin American funds on the platform. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first (out of four funds) in both 2005 and 2006, and was ranked second in 2007, 2008 and 2009, indicating a consistent ability to outperform its peers. |
| Malaysia |
|
Aberdeen Malaysian Equity (Risk Rating:9) (C,O)
The Aberdeen Malaysia Equity Fund was best performing Malaysian equity fund on the platform over cumulative two-year and three-year periods ending March 2010. On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first in 2005, 2007 and 2008, but its 30.4% return in 2009 was lower than the 39.2% average return for funds in the category. Despite the recent underperformance, the fund’s resilience in market downturns was demonstrated as it declined 29.4% between 31 December 2007 and 31 October 2008, significantly better than the 43.7% average decline of its peers. |
| Singapore Equity |
|
Aberdeen Singapore Equity (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The Aberdeen Singapore Equity Fund was best performing Singapore equity fund on the platform over a cumulative three-year period ending March 2010. The fund’s annualised 2.1% return is much stronger than the -4.6% average return of its peers, making it the only fund in the category to achieve a positive return over the period. The fund was also ranked second (out of ten funds in the category) for cumulative returns over four years and five years. The fund’s resilience was clearly demonstrated in the market downturn from 31 October 2007 to 27 February 2009 as the fund declined 48.6%, the least among its peers and substantially better than the 59% average decline for funds in the category. |
| Singapore bonds |
|
Legg Mason Spore Bond Class A SGD (Risk Rating:1) (C,O,S)
The Legg Mason Singapore Bond Fund has delivered returns in line with its peer average over four years (end March 2006 to end March 2010) with an annualised 3.6% return. On a calendar-year basis, the fund returned positive calendar-year returns over the past four years and was ranked first in 2007 and 2008. In terms of resilience, the fund has often managed to protect investors’ capital over past periods of downturn in the Singapore bond market. |
| Taiwan |
|
Fidelity Taiwan USD (Risk Rating:9) (C)
The Fidelity Funds - Taiwan Fund (USD) has demonstrated a stronger return over cumulative one-year, three-year, four-year and five-year periods ended March 2010. The fund had an annualised return of 1.9% over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010), better than its peer’s 0.7% return. While the fund declined more than its peer in 2008, the fund performed strongly in the subsequent market rebound with a 67.4% return in 2009, significantly stronger than its peer’s 55% gain. |
| Thailand |
|
Aberdeen Thailand Equity (Risk Rating:9) (C,O)
The Aberdeen Thailand Equity Fund was the best performing Thailand equity fund on the platform over a cumulative five-year period ended March 2010. The fund’s 8.3% annualised return over the period was stronger than the 6.2% average return for funds in the category. The fund also demonstrated strong consistency in calendar-year returns, and was ranked first (out of four funds in the category) in 2005, 2006 and 2008. The fund’s displayed its resilience in the recent market downturn, declining the least among its peers from 31 July 2007 to 28 November 2008, but underperformed in the subsequent recovery with a 57.6% increase in 2009, worse than the 72% average return of its peers. |
| US Equity |
|
FLF Opportunities USA USD (Risk Rating:8) (C)
The Fortis L Fund - Opportunities USA (USD) was the best performing US equity fund on the platform over a cumulative five-year period ended March 2010. The fund returned an annualised 5% over this period, substantially better than the -2.1% average return for funds in the category. On a calendar-year basis, the fund displayed consistency in performance and was ranked first in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 (out of five funds in the category). In the prolonged market downturn from 10 October 2007 to 9 March 2009, the fund displayed its resilience with a 28.6% decline, compared to the 51.3% average decline for US equity funds on the platform. |
|
Fidelity America USD (Risk Rating:8) (C,O)
The Fidelity Funds - America Fund (USD) was the second-best performing US equity fund on the platform over five years (end March 2005 to end March 2010). The fund’s annualised -0.9% return over this period compares favourably with the -2.1% average return for funds in the category. The fund was also the best performer over a cumulative two-year period ended March 2010). On a calendar-year basis, the fund was ranked first in 2009 (out of five funds in the category) with a 37% return, and was ranked second in 2005, indicating strong performances in market recoveries. |